Slicr vs 1inch Fusion
RFQ-style solver execution vs purpose-built TWAP on Base.
1inch Fusion is a solver-based RFQ system that lets resolvers compete to fill your order across many chains. Slicr is a focused TWAP execution engine on Base. Fusion's strength is best-price single-fill execution against an off-chain solver network. Slicr's strength is reducing price impact on orders large enough to move a Base pool, by walking the order in over time.
Side-by-side
| Attribute | Slicr | 1inch Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Primary chain | Base | Ethereum + many L2s |
| Execution model | Time-weighted slicing | Solver RFQ with Dutch auction price decay |
| Custody | Non-custodial on-chain vault | Non-custodial via 1inch router |
| Fee | 30 bps on token received | Resolver fee (varies); no protocol fee |
| MEV protection | Per-slice on-chain min/maxPrice guards | Private resolver fill |
| Best for | Sells too large for a single Base pool to absorb | Single-fill swaps where solvers can source liquidity off-chain |
| Settlement | On-chain, per slice | Single resolver fill |
Verdict
Fusion is great when a resolver can source the full fill from cross-venue liquidity. But on a thin Base pool, the resolver still has to walk the same curve as you would. Slicr's time-spread approach lets the pool recover between fills — something a single-shot RFQ cannot do.
Try Slicr on Base
Connect a wallet, pick tokens, choose a duration. Non-custodial. No counterparty.
Start a Slicr order →