Slicr vs CoW Protocol
Solver auctions on Ethereum vs time-weighted execution on Base.
CoW Protocol matches orders through coincidence-of-wants batches and solver auctions, primarily on Ethereum. Slicr is purpose-built for Base and solves a different problem: spreading a single large sale over time so each slice has minimal price impact against the pool. Both are non-custodial, but they're optimized for different trade types and chains.
Side-by-side
| Attribute | Slicr | CoW |
|---|---|---|
| Primary chain | Base | Ethereum (multichain) |
| Execution model | Time-weighted slicing across AMMs | Solver auction + CoW batches |
| Custody | Non-custodial on-chain vault | Non-custodial (off-chain orders) |
| Fee | 30 bps on token received | Solver bid + protocol fee |
| MEV protection | On-chain per-slice price guards | Batch auctions, uniform clearing price |
| Best for | Large sells on thin Base pools | Ethereum mainnet swaps with deep books |
| Recommended order size | $25K+ (smaller orders still profit; absolute saving is modest) | Any size |
Verdict
If you're selling a large position in a Base-native token, Slicr's time-spread execution captures price recovery that CoW's batch model is not designed to. If you're moving size on Ethereum mainnet against deep books, CoW's solver auctions are a natural fit.
Try Slicr on Base
Connect a wallet, pick tokens, choose a duration. Non-custodial. No counterparty.
Start a Slicr order →